Showing posts with label lord of the rings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lord of the rings. Show all posts

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Before it was "In Western Lands"

I was reading some of the History of The Lord of the Rings volumes. I was hoping they would help me with my paper, but unfortunately Christopher Tolkien is only really interested in the big picture changes that his father made to the books. Oh well.

Well, as I was reading the book, I came across the original version of "In Western Lands Beneath the Sun." Before I type it out, I will share the published version. I think it may be one of Tolkien's most beautiful poems:

In western lands beneath the Sun
the flowers may rise in Spring,
the trees may bud, the waters run,
the merry finches sing.
Or there maybe 'tis cloudless night
and swaying beeches bear
the Elven-stars as jewels white
amid their branching hair.

Though here at journey's end I lie
in darkness buried deep,
beyond all towers strong and high,
beyond all mountains steep,
above all shadows rides the Sun
and Stars forever dwell:
I will not say the Day is done,
nor bid the Stars farewell.

Beautiful, no?

Well, check out the original version:

I sit upon the stones alone;
the fire is burning red,
the tower is tall, the mountains dark;
all living things are dead.
In western lands the sun may shine,
the flower and tree in spring
is opening, is blossoming;
and there the finches sing.

But here I sit alone and think
of days when grass was green,
and earth was brown, and I was young:
they might have never been.
For they are gone, for ever lost,
and buried here I lie
and deep beneath the shadows sing
where hope and daylight die.

But still I sit and think of you;
I see you far away
Walking down the homely roads
on a bright and windy day.
It was merry then when I could run
to answer to your call,
could hear your voice or take your hand;
but now the night must fall.
And now beyond the world I sit,
and know not where you lie!
O Master, will you hear my voice
and answer ere we die?

For one thing, this reminds me of another beautiful Tolkien poem (this is a Tolkien poem extravaganza!...I think he writes beautifully wistful poetry), Bilbo's poem:

I sit beside the fire and think
of all that I have seen,
of meadow-flowers and butterflies
In summers that have been;

Of yellow leaves and gossamer
in autumns that there were,
with morning mist and silver sun
and wind upon my hair.

I sit beside the fire and think
of how the world will be
when winter comes without a spring
that I shall ever see.

For still there are so many things
that I have never seen:
in every wood in every spring
there is a different green.

I sit beside the fire and think
of people long ago,
and people who will see a world
that I shall never know.

But all the while I sit and think
of times there were before,
I listen for returning feet
and voices at the door.

I am very curious now as to which poem came first.

But all this was not what I was getting at. At first I got a kick out of the last line of the original "In western lands." (FYI: We're moving back to the second poem I typed). I thought it was very cutesy. In fact, I thought that the whole final stanza was very fan-fiction-y. (Fanfiction writers are free to take that as a complement or an insult. :-) ) But it suddenly struck me that it was reminiscent of the song in "The Black Bull of Norroway."

If you are a Tolkien fan "The Black Bull of Norroway" will ring a bell. I was actually a fan of that story before I read The Lord of the Rings. It's a fairy tale. But Tolkien ends his essay "On Fairie Stories" with the ending of the fairy tale because it provides a great example of Eucatastrophe. Here's the ending of the essay:

Far more powerful and poignant is the effect in a serious tale of Faerie. In such stories when the sudden "turn" comes we get a piercing glimpse of joy, and heart's desire, that for a moment passes outside the frame, rends indeed the very web of story, and lets a gleam come through.

"Seven long years I served for thee,
The glassy hill I clamb for thee,
The bluidy shirt I wrang for thee,
And wilt thou not wauken and turn to me?"

He heard and turned to her.


Anyway, (I love writing the absurdly long posts in which I say exactly one not-so-important thing!) I wonder if the original poem (again, second poem I typed) was in any way inspired by or affected by the Black Bull of Norroway? Of course, Sam's eucatastrophe didn't happen so instantaneously, but still it is similar:

"He ran to the figure huddled on the floor. It was Frodo."

Come on, it doesn't get much more eucatastrophic than that!

Well, that was a pointless post. To make it even more pointless, I shall add an unrelated picture. Goodnight.





Random Blatherings: If you read this, then you are the reeds to my Midas's barber.

1. Adam Lambert was born to play the Rum Tum Tugger. Truly.

2. My dad is extremely handsome. If you don't believe me look here: http://www.reval.com/Pages/default.aspx

3. Labradoodles are not that dumb. Arthur Clennam Bonsell can identify every member of the family except my mom. I have no idea why he can't ID my mom, though.

4. C.S. Lewis cried when he read "The Choices of Master Samwise." I knew that he had good taste.

5. Yes, the title of this post is dumb and corny!

6. The Hunchback of Notre Dame may be one of Disney's most interesting movies. It is not, however, appropriate for children. What were they thinking?

7. Everything I ever argued about The Lord of the Rings was already said by...

...drumroll please...

...J.R.R. Tolkien in his letters. I'm not sure how to feel about that. On the one hand, that could mean that I am a very discerning and astute reader. On the other hand, WHAT A WASTE OF ENERGY!

8. My sister and I screamed while watching an American Idol performance. Yes...we did...more than once. We figure that every girl should do that once in her teeny-bopper-hood. Maybe we're both out of teeny-bopper-hood, but we saw the opportunity to fill in the gap in our respective life-experiences, and we took it.

Sunday, June 29, 2008

All Good Things Must Come to an End

So, I should be sleeping. I've had about three hours of sleep in the past 48 hours. But I'm still psyched from going to the ISI Honors Colloquium.

Psyched may be the wrong word. My adrenaline is still pumping, but I'm actually sad. I enjoyed my time so much, and I am not particularly looking forward to cleaning my room and doing normal stuff again. I told myself that all good things must come to an end, and then I started thinking about the truth or untruth of that pessimistic phrase.

First, Heaven will not end. The statement is obviously not unqualifiedly true. But on earth does it hold? I guess so.

I just decided that I am too tired to continue this "conversation." Suffice it to say that I think good things end while good continues. (Think Sam Gamgee and the star.)

Goodnight.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

Animated Lord of the Rings

I've recently been reading a bunch of hysterical critiques of Bakshi's Lord of the Rings and the Rankin/Bass Return of the King. I loved the reviews because they pointed out all the idiosyncratic and idiotic elements of the movies, that my sister and I have been laughing at for the past ten years. I do have a soft spot in my heart for them, however. Farmor showed them to us when I was 8, and I was so enthralled that I tracked down the trilogy (hiding in Daddy's garage) and read it in a week (and then read it again). So, I had to think of something good about them, and here it is:

The Rankin/Bass Return of the King is filled with sappy songs that can be quite annoying. One that comes up more than once is "It's so easy not to try / let the world go drifting by. / If you never say hello, / you won't have to say goodbye." Silly. Sappy. Sorry.

HOWEVER

I think that this song alone gets closer to the heart of Tolkien's trilogy than anything Jackson made. Peter Jackson got so excited about the special effects and action, that he lost the beautiful wistfulness of the books. Tolkien is always talking about beauty passing away and being lost. Elf women give up their immortality, and Frodo Baggins give up the Shire that he suffered to protect. Yet Tolkien shows that it is better to have these beautiful things and lose them, than it is to just protect yourself.

This reminds me of a quote by C.S. Lewis: "Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable."

Lewis states eloquently what Tolkien showed in his book: To love is to be vulnerable, but obviously worth it. Rankin/Bass's song may not have been very eloquent. The movie may have missed plot details and hopelessly confused what it added. But it made the same point, through the song, and the bits of the Sam/Frodo story that they portrayed (admittedly, they did not preserve the point in the other half of the story as well, but then Sam and Frodo get the most screen time in this movie).

Doesn't that make the movie seem so much nicer!

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Inaugural Post

So, I decided to randomly start a blog. I think I'll just put the stuff I'm thinking about on it.

Right now I'm reading The Lord of the Rings for the first time in several years. The thing that I'm noticing the most this time through is its wistful quality and its bittersweetness. So much of the book revolves around the idea that there must always be suffering to gain something worthwhile. Much is made of preserving innocence. For example, Aragorn says (speaking of the hobbits), "If simple folk are free from care and fear, simple they will be, and we must be secret to keep them so." Aragorn fights for them to stay simple, but I think that Tolkien leads the reader to the conclusion that it is better to have care and fear if that is the only way one can see the beauties of the world. More on this later, though, because I think the development of the four hobbits, and especially of Sam, is important here. I want to reread the whole book before I begin blathering.

This theme is also found in Paradise Lost. There is bittersweetness at the end of Paradies Lost, for even if Adam and Eve are leaving the Eden, they are walking hand in hand into the greatest story of all: the story of Redemption. (Tolkien would call it the ultimate, and most beautiful myth--the true myth.) Anyway, Milton says he wants to justify the ways of God to man. How does he do this? My most recent thought on the matter is that Milton's justification is Paradise Lost itself--he can write this poem only because of the fall.

When I was a little girl, I worried about Heaven. Did I really want to go there if there could be no books? I love books and reading, but there is always sin in them, for without evil there can be no real conflict or satisfying resolution. I worried about this for so long. But the answer was always right there if I could only have seen it. A song we used to sing in Sunday School was "I love to tell the story," the refrain of which runs, "I love to tell the story, 'twill be my theme in glory: to tell the old, old story of Jesus and his love." Of course there will be stories in Heaven, for we all will have our personal stories of Jesus' love and then the "old, old story" of his death on the cross. And of course there will be sin in them, for it is the sin itself that makes the story possible.

And that is how Milton uses his poem as a justification: without the fall, there would be no Paradise Lost, and no redemption.

It seems as if this is the most simple answer to the question of evil. Evil is obviously a tool for God's glory, for it is an opportunity for God to manifest his love and mercy. Yet it is such a simplistic answer, that I must be missing something.

Did I just go from LotR to the problem of evil? I wonder if Tolkien had that in mind? I see it there, though...among many other things. The other things will have to wait because I want to read more!